point 1: (universal & Nintendo relationship)- we all know that both companies have had a strong relationship in the past few years with theme parks and movies being made and with how Nintendo likes to have a order to there productions working with one company is a good play.
point 2: (Avi arad) the most strained point is about the producer Avi arad, his political opinions on the ongoing genocide in Palestine and past grivances can make Nintendo distance themselves with from sony as to not get caught up in the controversy.
point 3: (live action) we always question on why the Zelda movie was live action, maybe it wasn't originally the plan. There have been rumors that Nintendo originally wanted the Zelda movie to a animated feature but the sony deal change that. I admnit this point is weak but it's something to look for.
Posted by Whole_Yak_2547
1 Comment
Is this movie based on the later two games, BOTW/TOTK? Also, it is insanely stupid if the movie is “Live Action” if it leans heavily on something like malice/gloom as a plot. I think a proper live action Zelda movie can work, if it doesn’t fall for the modern Live Action hybrid trap that is plaguing movies.