Share.

    16 Comments

    1. YonYonYonYonYon on

      “We want games to be sold separately!”
      >Game is sold separately
      “Why is it not on NSO?!”

    2. award_winning_writer on

      Which country is this? Can’t be the US, because NSO + Expansion pass is $50 a year, and FRLG are $20

    3. OP, You probably should’ve specified you were talking Canadian prices. Nintendo fans on this sub aren’t old enough yet to understand currency conversion rates unfortunately.

    4. I saw this coming. Game freak didn’t give their games to NSO because they couldn’t profit off it. So if you wanna blame someone for this blame them.

      Since NSO is a subscription model there’s no way to aptly share profits based on game streams. IMO the fact these games are available on switch and s2 in general is a win.

    5. It’s not $100 a year for me. Even if I was paying for the expansion pass. I would still not be paying $100

    6. Put them in a sub most Switch owners already have that also includes a bunch of other games from the same system, or just sell the same rom we already sold them on previous consoles again.

      Stop defending Nintendo/Pokemons/Game Freaks greed, please.

    7. I hate people you thinks nintendo and pokemon company/creature inc/game freak are the same entity

      there aren’t and they will never be
      pokemon just want more money now, they don’t care about qualities anymore
      if you want to check go in a nintendo store and compare price between nintendo product and pokemon merch
      Pokemon merch cost around 20$ more than a nintendo merch for the same things (2 t-shirt for exemple)

    8. I think it’s because Home wouldn’t have worked if FRLG had been on the subscription, also rewind would’ve made shiny hunting too easy