Sad we live in a world where we even need said disclaimers
Wrong_Revolution_679 on
That’s fantastic to hear
thejontorrweno on
Yeah good luck with that
Further, does it not kind of create a closed loop where mega companies will use AI (even if not generative and just purely for brainstorming or planning) trained on other materials to make their products, but then refuse to allow their works to also feed those models? I’m not pro-AI, but unless a company swears they never use AI in any capacity it feels like Disney making franchises off of topics in the public domain and then changing the laws and clamping down on things they created to not let someone else continue that cycle.
BareKnuckle18 on
Yeah because these AI companies def operate within the confines of the law 🤦. If someone uploads it somewhere (which they 100% will) an AI will be trained off it, simple as.
Good on them to try and put a foot down but it’s gonna take more than a line of text.
OdoWanKenobi on
As if people who train AIs will care. They’re already completely on board with intellectual property theft
Cheese0089 on
Is this like when old people make a Facebook status saying Facebook can’t own their content?
ColdFusion363 on
AI Bros and the hater grifters about to spread their dumb opinions across YouTube soon. It always happens.
mm615657 on
I now believe that the default option should be to exclude any media from AI training. Anyone who allows their content to be used for training, whether for free or for a fee, should be making a voluntary choice.
steamshotrise on
I think Universal has listed this on every movie they’ve released recently, I’m still surprised they’re the only studio that have bothered to have the disclaimer
Wordy_Potato on
Yeah, that’ll stop ’em!
[deleted] on
[deleted]
c0mpu73rguy on
I did notice it at the end of the credits, yes. So it’s the first movie to do that I assume?
ThePickleHawk on
Of all the movies to start an industry standard practice lol.
Boks1RE on
I actually noticed that in the credits while watching.
No_Construction2407 on
I wonder how long before the white house ignores this and posts a grok video combining bombing iran with mario galaxy
thickwonga on
This doesn’t mean shit when Nintendo stands by while the fucking White House makes AI photos of Trump in New Horizons.
AMileHighDM on
Is ai the new crypto or NFT? A giant rush to train and create AI’s for what?
carzaki27 on
not the only one. shows like pluribus and other animated movies like the chainsaw man reze arc also carry this disclaimer at the end of the credits. i think its a standard copyright thing now
Golden-Owl on
Wonder if this is going to be used to establish legal precedence in some way.
Nintendo is famously fiercely protective of its IP after all
BebeFanMasterJ on
Say what you want about Illumination but they at least have standards unlike Disney who had to be publicly shamed out of using AI.
lurking-in-the-bg on
This isn’t a new thing, it’s a disclaimer at the end of the credits for every major studio movie I’ve watched from Universal and I think also WB for at least the past year.
redDKtie on
Everyone here saying “they’re just gonna do it anyway” is missing the point.
This is building a much larger case.
Have_A_Jelly_Baby on
Pirates and AI bros: Sure Nintendo, no problem.
*(Does it anyway)*
1337gamer15 on
Yep, saw that and pointed it out in the theater. Looks like Bad Guys 2 set a good example!
Benhurso on
How does the disclaimer stops AI from using it?
jonvonboner on
Good first step but we need policies with teeth to enforce this. There needs to be a whole regulation group who gets paid to sweep through AI models every week and make sure they’re not adding newer movies to their training data. Studios need to pay for this to protect their IP and legacy libraries. This needs to be directly punishable. I want to see BIG lawsuits against the Open AI and anyone else who violates.
ReturnOfTheFrickinG on
It’s unfortunate that the standard is becoming that you have to rescind permission for your work to be used in AI training rather than provide it.
mathfacts on
AI should need consent/compensation for any content that goes into training it.
jackie__shan on
How anyone can check that no one will use this movie to train their AI ? It’s literally two clicks to perform that.
29 Comments
Sad we live in a world where we even need said disclaimers
That’s fantastic to hear
Yeah good luck with that
Further, does it not kind of create a closed loop where mega companies will use AI (even if not generative and just purely for brainstorming or planning) trained on other materials to make their products, but then refuse to allow their works to also feed those models? I’m not pro-AI, but unless a company swears they never use AI in any capacity it feels like Disney making franchises off of topics in the public domain and then changing the laws and clamping down on things they created to not let someone else continue that cycle.
Yeah because these AI companies def operate within the confines of the law 🤦. If someone uploads it somewhere (which they 100% will) an AI will be trained off it, simple as.
Good on them to try and put a foot down but it’s gonna take more than a line of text.
As if people who train AIs will care. They’re already completely on board with intellectual property theft
Is this like when old people make a Facebook status saying Facebook can’t own their content?
AI Bros and the hater grifters about to spread their dumb opinions across YouTube soon. It always happens.
I now believe that the default option should be to exclude any media from AI training. Anyone who allows their content to be used for training, whether for free or for a fee, should be making a voluntary choice.
I think Universal has listed this on every movie they’ve released recently, I’m still surprised they’re the only studio that have bothered to have the disclaimer
Yeah, that’ll stop ’em!
[deleted]
I did notice it at the end of the credits, yes. So it’s the first movie to do that I assume?
Of all the movies to start an industry standard practice lol.
I actually noticed that in the credits while watching.
I wonder how long before the white house ignores this and posts a grok video combining bombing iran with mario galaxy
This doesn’t mean shit when Nintendo stands by while the fucking White House makes AI photos of Trump in New Horizons.
Is ai the new crypto or NFT? A giant rush to train and create AI’s for what?
not the only one. shows like pluribus and other animated movies like the chainsaw man reze arc also carry this disclaimer at the end of the credits. i think its a standard copyright thing now
Wonder if this is going to be used to establish legal precedence in some way.
Nintendo is famously fiercely protective of its IP after all
Say what you want about Illumination but they at least have standards unlike Disney who had to be publicly shamed out of using AI.
This isn’t a new thing, it’s a disclaimer at the end of the credits for every major studio movie I’ve watched from Universal and I think also WB for at least the past year.
Everyone here saying “they’re just gonna do it anyway” is missing the point.
This is building a much larger case.
Pirates and AI bros: Sure Nintendo, no problem.
*(Does it anyway)*
Yep, saw that and pointed it out in the theater. Looks like Bad Guys 2 set a good example!
How does the disclaimer stops AI from using it?
Good first step but we need policies with teeth to enforce this. There needs to be a whole regulation group who gets paid to sweep through AI models every week and make sure they’re not adding newer movies to their training data. Studios need to pay for this to protect their IP and legacy libraries. This needs to be directly punishable. I want to see BIG lawsuits against the Open AI and anyone else who violates.
It’s unfortunate that the standard is becoming that you have to rescind permission for your work to be used in AI training rather than provide it.
AI should need consent/compensation for any content that goes into training it.
How anyone can check that no one will use this movie to train their AI ? It’s literally two clicks to perform that.