You have to love backwards compatibility. Sadly, a lot of good titles are still left on older systems.

    Posted by MSotallyTober

    Share.

    12 Comments

    1. EmergencyBanshee on

      I still remember the gist of a review of the game in op’s post.

      “While game publishers might try to over emphasise how much a celebrity might contribute to a game carrying their name and likeness, you might wonder this time around, because 50 Cent: blood on the sand is exactly the game you might make if you had been shot 9 times.” (The reviewer was not a fan.)

    2. It’s such a failure of marketing on Xbox side that they don’t talk about BC at all, it’s a very important feature to me and many other people that play older games otherwise unplayable unless they buy legacy systems

    3. ShabbatShalom666 on

      It pisses me off to no end that we have basically every rockstar game, except the warriors. Playstation who have awful backwards compatibility decided they wanted some weird exlusive deal to it and then couldn’t even be bothered to make sure the game was playable.

    4. It’s a bummer that so many licensed movie tie-in video games having licensing issues that stop them from being backwards compatible. Those are my favorites. 

    5. Paid $100 for 50 cent blood in the sand. Runs a locked 60fps (series x) and I wanna say 1080p. I never had this game when it came out.

    6. Its shame that those early 2000′ EA’s LOTR and James Bond games are not ported to modern systems,but all the music/actor lisencing is probably biggest reason for that not to happen.